Can. 1501 A judge cannot investigate any case unless a
plea, drawn up in accordance with canon law, is submitted either by a
person whose interest is involved, or by the promoter of justice.
Can. 1502 A person who wishes to sue another must present a petition
to a judge who is lawfully competent. In this petition the matter in
dispute is to be set out and the intervention of the judge requested.
Can. 1503 §1 A judge can admit an oral plea whenever the plaintiff
is impeded from presenting a petition or when the case can be easily
investigated and is of minor significance.
§2 In both cases, however, the judge is to direct a notary to record
the matter in writing. This written record is to be read to, and
approved by, the plaintiff, and it takes the place of a petition written
by the plaintiff as far as all effects of law are concerned.
Can. 1504 The petition by which a suit is introduced must:
1° state the judge before whom the case is being introduced, what is
being sought and from whom it is being sought;
2° indicate on what right the plaintiff bases the case and, at least
in general terms, the facts and evidence to be submitted in support of
the allegations made;
3° be signed by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's procurator, and
bear the day, the month and the year, as well as the address at which
the plaintiff or the procurator resides, or at which they say they
reside for the purpose of receiving the acts;
4° indicate the domicile or quasidomicile of the respondent.
Can. 1505 §1 Once he has satisfied himself that the matter is within
his competence and the plaintiff has the right to stand before the
court, the sole judge, or the presiding judge of a collegiate tribunal,
must as soon as possible by his decree either admit or reject the
petition.
§2 A petition can be rejected only if:
1° the judge or the tribunal is not legally competent;
2° it is established beyond doubt that the plaintiff lacks the right
to stand before the court;
3° the provisions of can. 1504 nn. 13 have not been observed
4° it is certainly clear from the petition that the plea lacks any
foundation, and that there is no possibility that a foundation will
emerge from a process.
§3 If a petition has been rejected by reason of defects which can be
corrected, the plaintiff can draw up a new petition correctly and
present it again to the same judge.
§4 A party is always entitled, within ten canonical days, to have
recourse, based upon stated reasons, against the rejection of a
petition. This recourse is to be made either to the tribunal of appeal
or, if the petition was rejected by the presiding judge, to the
collegiate tribunal. A question of rejection is to be determined with
maximum expedition.
Can. 1506 If within a month of the presentation of a petition, the
judge has not issued a decree admitting or rejecting it in accordance
with can. 1505, the interested party can insist that the judge perform
his duty. If, notwithstanding this, the judge does not respond within
ten days of the party's request, the petition is to be taken as having
been admitted.
CHAPTER II : THE SUMMONS AND THE INTIMATION OF
JUDICIAL ACTS
Can. 1507 §1 In the decree by which a plaintiff's petition is
admitted, the judge or the presiding judge must call or summon the other
parties to court to effect the joinder of the issue; he must prescribe
whether, in order to agree the point at issue, they are to reply in
writing or to appear before him. If, from their written replies, he
perceives the need to convene the parties, he can determine this by a
new decree.
§2 If a petition is deemed admitted in accordance with the
provisions of can. 1506, the decree of summons to the trial must be
issued within twenty days of the request of which that canon speaks.
§3 If the litigants in fact present themselves before the judge to
pursue the case, there is no need for a summons; the notary, however, is
to record in the acts that the parties were present at the trial.
Can. 1508 §1 The decree of summons to the trial must be notified at
once to the respondent, and at the same time to any others who are
obliged to appear.
§2 The petition introducing the suit is to be attached to the
summons, unless for grave reasons the judge considers that the petition
is not to be communicated to the other party before he or she gives
evidence.
§3 If a suit is brought against a person who does not have the free
exercise of personal rights, or the free administration of the matters
in dispute, the summons is to be notified to, as the case may be, the
guardian, the curator, the special procurator, or the one who according
to law is obliged to undertake legal proceedings in the name of such a
person.
Can. 1509 §1 With due regard to the norms laid down by particular
law, the notification of summonses, decrees, judgments and other
judicial acts is to be done by means of the public postal service, or by
some other particularly secure means.
§2 The fact and the manner of notification must be shown in the
acts.
Can. 1510 A respondent who refuses to accept a document of summons,
or who circumvents the delivery of a summons, is to be regarded as
lawfully summoned.
Can. 1511 Without prejudice to the provision of can. 1507 §3, if a
summons has not been lawfully communicated, the acts of the process are
null.
Can. 1512 Once a summons has been lawfully communicated, or the
parties have presented themselves before a judge to pursue the case:
1° the matter ceases to be a neutral one;
2° the case becomes that of the judge or of the tribunal, in other
respects lawfully competent, before whom the action was brought;
3° the jurisdiction of a delegated judge is established in such a
way that it does not lapse on the expiry of the authority of the person
who delegated;
4° prescription is interrupted, unless otherwise provided;
5° the suit begins to be a pending one, and therefore the principle
immediately applies 'while a suit is pending, no new element is to be
introduced'.
TITLE II: THE JOINDER OF THE ISSUE
Can. 1513 §1 The joinder of the issue occurs when the terms of the
controversy, as derived from the pleas and the replies of the parties,
are determined by a decree of the judge.
§2 The pleas and the replies of the parties may be expressed not
only in the petition introducing the suit, but also either in the
response to the summons, or in statements made orally before the judge.
In more difficult cases, however, the parties are to be convened by the
judge, so as to agree the question or questions to which the judgment
must respond.
§3 The decree of the judge is to be notified to the parties. Unless
they have already agreed on the terms, they may within ten days have
recourse to the same judge to request that the decree be altered. This
question, however, is to be decided with maximum expedition by a decree
of the judge.
Can. 1514 Once determined, the terms of the controversy cannot
validly be altered except by a new decree, issued for a grave reason, at
the request of the party, and after the other parties have been
consulted and their observations considered.
Can. 1515 Once the joinder of the issue has occurred, the possessor
of another's property ceases to be in good faith. If, therefore, the
judgment is that he or she return the property, the possessor must
return also any profits accruing from the date of the joinder, and must
compensate for damages.
Can. 1516 Once the joinder of the issue has occurred, the judge is to
prescribe an appropriate time within which the parties are to present
and to complete the evidence.
TITLE III: THE TRIAL OF THE ISSUE
Can. 1517 The trial of the issue is initiated by the summons. It is
concluded not only by the pronouncement of the definitive judgment, but
also by other means determined by law.
Can. 1518 If a litigant dies, or undergoes a change in status, or
ceases from the office in virtue of which he or she was acting:
1° if the case has not yet been concluded, the trial is suspended
until the heir of the deceased, or the successor, or a person whose
interest is involved, resumes the suit
2° if the case has been concluded, the judge must proceed to the
remaining steps of the case, having first summoned the procurator, if
there is one, or else the heir or the successor of the deceased.
Can. 1519 §1 If the guardian or the curator or the procurator
required in accordance with can. 1481 §§1 and 3, ceases from office,
the trial is suspended for the time being.
§2 However, the judge is to appoint another guardian or curator as
soon as possible. He can appoint a procurator ad litem if the party has
neglected to do so within the brief time prescribed by the judge
himself.
Can. 1520 If over a period of six months, no procedural act is
performed by the parties, and they have not been impeded from doing so,
the trial is abated. Particular law may prescribe other time limits for
abatement.
Can. 1521 Abatement takes effect by virtue of the law itself, and it
is effective against everyone, even minors and those equivalent to
minors; moreover, it must be declared even ex officio. This, however, is
without prejudice to the right to claim compensation against those
guardians, curators, administrators and procurators who have not proved
that they were without fault.
Can. 1522 Abatement extinguishes the acts of the process, but not the
acts of the case. The acts of the case may indeed be employed in another
instance, provided the case is between the same persons and about the
same matter. As far as those outside the case are concerned, however
these acts have no standing other than as documents.
Can. 1523 When a trial has been abated, the litigants are to bear the
expenses which each has incurred.
Can. 1524 §1 The plaintiff may renounce a trial at any stage or at
any grade. Likewise, both the plaintiff and the respondent may renounce
the acts of the process either in whole or only in part.
§2 To renounce the trial of an issue, guardians and administrators
of juridical persons must have the advice or the consent of those whose
agreement is required to conduct negotiations which exceed the limits of
ordinary administration.
§3 To be valid, a renunciation must be in writing, and must be
signed either by the party, or by a procurator who has been given a
special mandate for this purpose; it must be communicated to the other
party, who must accept or at least not oppose it; and it must be
admitted by the judge.
Can. 1525 Once a renunciation has been admitted by the judge, it has
the same effects for the acts which have been renounced as has an
abatement of the trial. Likewise, it obliges the person renouncing to
pay the expenses of those acts which have been renounced.
TITLE IV: PROOFS
Can. 1526 §1 The onus of proof rests upon the person who makes an
allegation.
§2 The following matters do not require proof:
1° matters which are presumed by the law itself;
2° facts alleged by one of the litigants and admitted by the other,
unless their proof is nevertheless required either by law or by the
judge.
Can. 1527 §1 Any type of proof which seems useful for the
investigation of the case and is lawful, may be admitted.
§2 If a party submits that proof, which has been rejected by the
judge, should be admitted, the judge is to determine the matter with
maximum expedition.
Can. 1528 If a party or a witness refuses to testify before the
judge, that person may lawfully be heard by another, even a lay person,
appointed by the judge, or asked to make a declaration either before a
public notary or in any other lawful manner.
Can. 1529 Unless there is a grave reason, the judge is not to proceed
to collect the proofs before the joinder of the issue.
CHAPTER I : THE DECLARATIONS OF THE PARTIES
Can. 1530 The judge may always question the parties the more closely
to elicit the truth. He must do so if requested by one of the parties,
or in order to prove a fact which the public interest requires to be
placed beyond doubt.
Can. 1531 §1 A party who is lawfully questioned is obliged to
respond and to tell the whole truth.
§2 If a party has refused to reply, it is for the judge to evaluate
what, as far as the proof of the facts is concerned, can be deduced
therefrom.
Can. 1532 Unless a grave reason suggests otherwise, in cases in which
the public good is at stake the judge is to administer to the parties an
oath that they will tell the truth, or at least that what they have said
is the truth. In other cases, it is left to the prudent discretion of
the judge to determine whether an oath is to be administered.
Can. 1533 The parties, the promoter of justice and the defender of
the bond may submit to the judge propositions upon which a party is to
be questioned.
Can. 1534 The provisions of canon. 15482, n. 1, 1552 and 15581565
concerning witnesses are to be observed, with the appropriate
qualifications, in the questioning of the parties.
Can. 1535 A judicial confession is an assertion of fact against
oneself, concerning a matter relevant to the trial, which is made by a
party before a judge who is legally competent; this is so whether the
assertion is made in writing or orally, whether spontaneously or in
response to the judge's questioning.
Can. 1536 §1 In a private matter and where the public good is not at
stake, a judicial confession of one party relieves the other parties of
the onus of proof.
§2 In cases which concern the public good, however, a judicial
confession, and declarations by the parties which are not confessions,
can have a probative value that is to be weighed by the judge in
association with the other circumstances of the case, but the force of
full proof cannot be attributed to them unless there are other elements
which wholly corroborate them.
Can. 1537 It is for the judge, having considered all the
circumstances, to evaluate the weight to be given to an extrajudicial
confession which is introduced into the trial.
Can. 1538 A confession, or any other declaration of a party, is
devoid of all force if clearly shown to be based on an error of fact or
to have been extracted by force or grave fear.
CHAPTER II : DOCUMENTARY PROOF
Can. 1539 In every type of trial documentary proof is admitted,
whether the documents be public or private.
ARTICLE 1: THE NATURE AND RELIABILITY OF DOCUMENTS
Can. 1540 §1 Public ecclesiastical documents are those which an
official person draws up in the exercise of his or her function in the
Church and in which the formalities required by law have been observed.
§2 Public civil documents are those which are legally regarded as
such in accordance with the laws of each place.
§3 All other documents are private.
Can. 1541 Unless it is otherwise established by contrary and clear
arguments, public documents constitute acceptable evidence of those
matters which are directly and principally affirmed in them.
Can. 1542 A private document, whether acknowledged by a party or
admitted by a judge, has the same probative force as an extrajudicial
confession, against its author or the person who has signed it and
against persons whose case rests on that of the author or signatory.
Against others it has the same force as have declarations by the parties
which are not confessions, in accordance with can. 1536 §2.
Can. 1543 If documents are shown to have been erased, amended,
falsified or otherwise tampered with, it is for the judge to evaluate to
what extent, if any, they are to be given credence.
ARTICLE 2: THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Can. 1544 Documents do not have probative force at a trial unless
they are submitted in original form or in authentic copy and are lodged
in the office of the tribunal, so that they may be inspected by the
judge and by the opposing party.
Can. 1545 The judge can direct that a document common to each of the
parties is to be submitted in the process.
Can. 1546 §1 No one is obliged to exhibit documents, even if they
are common, which cannot be communicated without danger of the harm
mentioned in can. 1548 §2, n. 2, or without the danger of violating a
secret which is to be observed.
§2 If, however, at least an extract from a document can be
transcribed and submitted in copy without the disadvantages mentioned,
the judge can direct that it be produced in that form.
CHAPTER III : WITNESSES AND TESTIMONY
Can. 1547 Proof by means of witnesses is admitted in all cases, under
the direction of the judge.
Can. 1548 §1 Witnesses must tell the truth to a judge who lawfully
questions them.
§2 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1550 §2, n. 2 the
following are exempted from the obligation of replying to questions:
1° clerics, in those matters revealed to them by reason of their
sacred ministry; civil officials, doctors, midwives, advocates, notaries
and others who are bound by the secret of their office, even on the
ground of having offered advice, in respect of matters subject to this
secret;
2° those who fear that, as a result of giving evidence, a loss of
reputation, dangerous harassment or some other grave evil will arise for
themselves, their spouses, or those related to them by consanguinity or
affinity.
ARTICLE 1: THOSE WHO CAN BE WITNESSES
Can. 1549 Everyone can be a witness, unless expressly excluded,
whether wholly or in part, by the law.
Can. 1550 §1 Minors under the age of fourteen years and those who
are of feeble mind are not admitted to give evidence. They can, however,
be heard if the judge declares by a decree that it would be appropriate
to do so.
§2 The following are deemed incapable of being witnesses:
1° the parties in the case or those who appear at the trial in the
name of the parties; the judge and his assistant; the advocate and those
others who in the same case assist or have assisted the parties;
2° priests, in respect of everything which has become known to them
in sacramental confession, even if the penitent has asked that these
things be made known. Moreover, anything that may in any way have been
heard by anyone on the occasion of confession, cannot be accepted even
as an indication of the truth.
ARTICLE 2: THE INTRODUCTION AND THE EXCLUSION OF
WITNESSES
Can. 1551 A party who has introduced a witness may forego the
examination of that witness, but the opposing party may ask that the
witness nevertheless be examined.
Can. 1552 §1 When proof by means of witnesses is sought, the names
and addresses of the witnesses are to be communicated to the tribunal.
§2 The propositions on which the interrogation of the witnesses is
requested, are to be submitted within the time limit determined by the
judge; otherwise, the request is to be deemed abandoned.
Can. 1553 It is for the judge to curb an excessive number of
witnesses.
Can. 1554 Before witnesses are examined, their names are to be
communicated to the parties. If, in the prudent opinion of the judge,
this cannot be done without great difficulty, it is to be done at least
before the publication of the evidence.
Can. 1555 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1550, a party
may request that a witness be excluded, provided a just reason for
exclusion is established before the witness is examined.
Can. 1556 The summons of a witness is effected by a decree of the
judge lawfully notified to the witness.
Can. 1557 A properly summoned witness is to appear, or to make known
to the judge the reason for being absent.
ARTICLE 3: THE EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES
Can. 1558 §1 Witnesses are to be examined at the office of the
tribunal unless the judge deems otherwise.
§2 Cardinals, Patriarchs, Bishops, and those who in their own civil
law enjoy a similar favor, are to be heard at the place selected by
themselves.
§3 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1418 and 1469 §2,
the judge is to decide where witnesses are to be heard for whom, by
reason of distance, illness or other impediment, it is impossible or
difficult to come to the office of the tribunal.
Can. 1559 The parties cannot be present at the examination of the
witnesses unless, especially when there is question of a private
interest, the judge has determined that they are to be admitted. Their
advocates or procurators, however, may attend, unless by reason of the
circumstances of matter and persons, the judge has determined that the
proceedings are to be in secret.
Can. 1560 §1 The witnesses are to be examined individually and
separately.
§2 If in a grave matter the witnesses disagree either among
themselves or with one of the parties, the judge may arrange for those
who differ to meet or to confront one another, but must, in so far as
possible, eliminate discord and scandal.
Can. 1561 The examination of a witness is conducted by the judge, or
by his delegate or an auditor, who is to be attended by a notary.
Accordingly, unless particular law provides otherwise, if the parties or
the promoter of justice or the defender of the bond or the advocates who
are present at the hearing have additional questions to put to the
witness, they are to propose these not to the witness, but to the judge,
or to the one who is taking the judge's place, so that he or she may put
them.
Can. 1562 §1 The judge is to remind the witness of the grave
obligation to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
§2 The judge is to administer an oath to the witness in accordance
with can. 1532. If, however, a witness refuses to take an oath, he or
she is to be heard unsworn.
Can. 1563 The judge is first of all to establish the identity of the
witness. The relationship which the witness has with the parties is to
be probed, and when specific questions concerning the case are asked of
the witness enquiry is to be made into the sources of his or her
knowledge and the precise time the witness came to know the matters
which are asserted.
Can. 1564 The questions are to be brief, and appropriate to the
understanding of the person being examined. They are not to encompass a
number of matters at the same time, nor be captious or deceptive. They
are not to be leading questions, nor give any form of offence. They are
to be relevant to the case in question.
Can. 1565 §1 The questions are not to be made known in advance to
the witnesses.
§2 If, however, the matters about which evidence is to be given are
so remote in memory that they cannot be affirmed with certainty unless
they are recalled beforehand, the judge may, if he thinks this can
safely be done, advise the witness in advance about certain aspects of
the matter.
Can. 1566 The witnesses are to give evidence orally. They are not to
read from a script, except where there is a question of calculations or
accounts; in this case, they may consult notes which they have brought
with them.
Can. 1567 §1 The replies are to be written down at once by the
notary. The record must show the very words of the evidence given, at
least in what concerns those things which bear directly on the matter of
the trial.
§2 The use of a taperecorder is allowed, provided the replies are
subsequently committed to writing and, if possible, signed by the
deponents.
Can. 1568 The notary is to mention in the acts whether the oath was
taken or excused or refused; who were present, parties and others; the
questions added ex officio; and in general, everything worthy of record
which may have occurred while the witnesses were being examined.
Can. 1569 §1 At the conclusion of the examination, the record of the
evidence, either as written down by the notary or as played back from
the taperecording, must be communicated to the witness, who is to be
given the opportunity of adding to, omitting from, correcting or varying
it.
§2 Finally, the witness, the judge and the notary must sign the
record.
Can. 1570 Before the acts or the testimony are published, witnesses,
even though already examined, may be called for reexamination, either
at the request of a party or ex officio. This may be done if the judge
considers it either necessary or useful, provided there is no danger
whatever of collusion or of inducement.
Can. 1571 Witnesses must be refunded both the expenses they incurred
and the losses they sustained by reason of their giving evidence, in
accordance with the equitable assessment of the judge.
ARTICLE 4: THE CREDIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
Can. 1572 In weighing evidence the judge may, if it is necessary,
seek testimonial letters, and is to take into account:
1° the condition and uprightness of the witness
2° whether the knowledge was acquired at first hand, particularly if
it was something seen or heard personally, or whether it was opinion,
rumor or hearsay;
3° whether the witness is constant and consistent, or varies, is
uncertain or vacillating;
4° whether there is corroboration of the testimony, and whether it
is confirmed or not by other items of evidence.
Can. 1573 The deposition of one witness cannot amount to full proof,
unless the witness is a qualified one who gives evidence on matters
carried out in an official capacity, or unless the circumstances of
persons and things persuade otherwise.
CHAPTER IV : EXPERTS
Can. 1574 The services of experts are to be used whenever, by a
provision of the law or of the judge, their study and opinion, based
upon their art or science, are required to establish some fact or to
ascertain the true nature of some matter.
Can. 1575 It is for the judge, after hearing the opinions or
suggestions of the parties, to appoint the experts or, if such is the
case, to accept reports already made by other experts.
Can. 1576 Experts can be excluded or objected to for the same reasons
as witnesses.
Can. 1577 §1 The judge in his decree must define the specific terms
of reference to be considered in the expert's task, taking into account
whatever may have been gathered from the litigants.
§2 The expert is to be given the acts of the case, and any documents
and other material needed for the proper and faithful discharge of his
or her duty.
§3 The judge, after discussion with the expert, is to determine a
time for the completion of the examination and the submission of the
report.
Can. 1578 §1 Each expert is to complete a report distinct from that
of the others, unless the judge orders that one report be drawn up and
signed by all of them. In this case, differences of opinion, if there
are such, are to be faithfully noted.
§2 Experts must clearly indicate the documents or other appropriate
means by which they have verified the identity of persons, places or
things. They are also to state the manner and method followed in
fulfilling the task assigned to them, and the principal arguments upon
which their conclusions are based.
§3 If necessary, the expert may be summoned by the judge to supply
further explanations.
Can. 1579 §1 The judge is to weigh carefully not only the expert's
conclusions, even when they agree, but also all the other circumstances
of the case.
§2 When he is giving the reasons for his decision, the judge must
state on what grounds he accepts or rejects the conclusions of the
experts.
Can. 1580 Experts are to be paid their expenses and honorariums.
These are to be determined by the judge in a proper and equitable
manner, with due observance of particular law.
Can. 1581 §1 Parties can designate their own experts, to be approved
by the judge.
§2 If the judge admits them, these experts can inspect the acts of
the case, in so far as required for the discharge of their duty, and can
be present when the appointed experts fulfill their role. They can
always submit their reports.
CHAPTER V : JUDICIAL ACCESS AND INSPECTION
Can. 1582 If, in order to decide the case, the judge considers it
opportune to visit some place, or inspect some thing, he is to set this
out in a decree. After he has heard the parties, the decree is to give a
brief description of what is to be made available for this access.
Can. 1583 After the inspection has been carried out, a document
concerning it is to be drawn up.
CHAPTER VI : PRESUMPTIONS
Can. 1584 A presumption is a probable conjecture about something
which is uncertain. Presumptions of law are those stated in the law;
human presumptions are those made by a judge.
Can. 1585 A person with a presumption of law in his or her favor is
freed from the onus of proof, which then falls on the other party.
Can. 1586 The judge is not to make presumptions which are not stated
in the law, other than on the basis of a certain and determinate fact
directly connected to the matter in dispute.
TITLE V: INCIDENTAL MATTERS
Can. 1587 An incidental matter arises when, after the case has begun
by the summons, a question is proposed which, even though not expressly
raised in the petition which introduced the case, is yet so relevant to
the case that it needs to be settled before the principal question.
Can. 1588 An incidental matter is proposed before the judge who is
competent to decide the principal case. It is raised in writing or
orally, indicating the connection between it and the principal case.
Can. 1589 §1 When the judge has received the petition and heard the
parties, he is to decide with maximum expedition whether the proposed
incidental matter has a foundation in, and a connection with, the
principal matter, or whether it is to be rejected from the outset. If he
admits it he must decide whether it is of such gravity that it needs to
be determined by an interlocutory judgment or by a decree.
§2 If, however, he concludes that the incidental matter is not to be
decided before the definitive judgment, he is to determine that account
be taken of it when the principal matter is decided.
Can. 1590 §1 If the incidental matter is to be decided by judgment,
the norms for a contentious oral process are to be observed unless,
because of the gravity of the issue, the judge deems otherwise.
§2 If it is to be decided by decree, the tribunal can entrust the
matter to an auditor or to the presiding judge.
Can. 1591 Before the principal matter is concluded, the judge or the
tribunal may for a just reason revoke or alter an interlocutory judgment
or decree. This can be done either at the request of a party or ex
officio by the judge after he has heard the parties.
CHAPTER I : THE NONAPPEARANCE OF PARTIES
Can. 1592 §1 If a respondent is summoned but does not appear, and
either does not offer an adequate excuse for absence or has not replied
in accordance with can. 1507 §1, the judge is to declare the person
absent from the process, and decree that the case is to proceed to the
definitive judgment and to its execution, with due observance of the
proper norms.
§2 Before issuing the decree mentioned in §1, the judge must make
sure, if necessary by means of another summons, that a lawful summons
did reach the respondent within the canonical time.
Can. 1593 §1 If the respondent thereafter appears before the judge,
or replies before the trial is concluded, he or she can bring forward
conclusions and proofs, without prejudice to the provisions of can.
1600; the judge is to take care, however, that the process is not
deliberately prolonged by lengthy and unnecessary delays.
§2 Even if the respondent has neither appeared nor given a reply
before the case is decided, he or she can challenge the judgment; if the
person can show that there was a just reason for being absent, and that
there was no fault involved in not intimating this earlier, a plaint of
nullity can be lodged.
Can. 1594 If the plaintiff does not appear on the day and at the hour
arranged for the joinder of the issue, and does not offer a suitable
excuse:
1° the judge is to summon the plaintiff again;
2° if the plaintiff does not obey the new summons, it is presumed
that the case has been abandoned in accordance with canon. 15241525;
3° if the plaintiff should want to intervene at a subsequent stage
in the process, the provisions of can. 1593 are to be observed.
Can. 1595 §1 A party, whether plaintiff or respondent, who is absent
from the trial, and who does not establish the existence of a just
impediment, is bound to pay the expenses which have been incurred in the
case because of this absence, and also, if need be, to indemnify the
other party.
§2 If both the plaintiff and the respondent were absent from the
trial, they are jointly bound to pay the expenses of the case.
CHAPTER II : THE INTERVENTION OF A THIRD PARTY IN A
CASE
Can. 1596 §1 Any person with a legitimate interest can be allowed to
intervene in a case in any instance of the suit, either as a party
defending his or her own right or, in an accessory role, to help one of
the litigants.
§2 To be admitted, however, the person must, before the conclusion
of the case, produce to the judge a petition which briefly establishes
the right to intervene.
§3 A person who intervenes in a case is to be admitted at that stage
which the case has reached. If the case has reached the evidence stage,
a brief and peremptory time limit is to be assigned within which to
bring forward evidence.
Can. 1597 A third party whose intervention is seen to be necessary
must be called into the case by the judge, after he has consulted the
parties.
TITLE VI: THE PUBLICATION OF THE ACTS,
THE CONCLUSION OF THE CASE AND THE PLEADINGS
Can. 1598 §1 When the evidence has been assembled, the judge must,
under pain of nullity, by a decree permit the parties and their
advocates to inspect at the tribunal office those acts which are not yet
known to them. Indeed, if the advocates so request, a copy of the acts
can be given to them. In cases which concern the public good, however,
the judge can decide that, in order to avoid very serious dangers, some
part or parts of the acts are not to be shown to anyone; he must take
care, however, that the right of defense always remains intact.
§2 To complete the evidence, the parties can propose other items of
proof to the judge. When these have been assembled the judge can, if he
deems it appropriate, again issue a decree as in §1.
Can. 1599 §1 When everything concerned with the production of
evidence has been completed, the conclusion of the case is reached.
§2 This conclusion occurs when the parties declare that they have
nothing further to add, or when the canonical time allotted by the judge
for the production of evidence has elapsed, or when the judge declares
that he considers the case to be sufficiently instructed.
§3 By whichever way the case has come to its conclusion, the judge
is to issue a decree declaring that it is concluded.
Can. 1600 Only in the following situations can the judge, after the
conclusion of the case, still recall earlier witnesses or call new ones,
or make provision for other evidence not previously requested:
1° in cases in which only the private good of the parties is
involved if all the parties agree;
2° in other cases, provided that the parties have been consulted,
that a grave reason exists, and that all danger of fraud or subornation
is removed;
3° in all cases, whenever it is probable that, unless new evidence
is admitted, the judgment will be unjust for any of the reasons
mentioned in can. 1645 §2, nn. 13.
§2 The judge can, however, command or permit the presentation of a
document which, even without fault of the interested party, could not be
presented earlier.
§3 New evidence is to be published according to can. 1598 §1.
Can. 1601 When the case has been concluded, the judge is to determine
a suitable period of time for the presentation of pleadings and
observations.
Can. 1602 §1 Pleadings and observations are to be in writing unless
the judge, with the consent of the parties, considers it sufficient to
have a discussion before the tribunal in session.
§2 If the pleadings and the principal documents are to be printed,
the prior permission of the judge is required, and the obligation of
secrecy, where it exists, is still to be observed.
§3 The directions of the tribunal are to be observed in questions
concerning the length of the pleadings, the number of copies and other
similar matters.
Can. 1603 §1 When the pleadings and observations have been
exchanged, each party can make reply within a brief period of time
determined by the judge.
§2 This right is given to the parties once only, unless for a grave
reason the judge considers that the right to a second reply is to be
given; if this right is given to one party, it is to be considered as
given to the other as well.
§3 The promoter of justice and the defender of the bond have the
right to respond to every reply of the parties.
Can. 1604 §1 It is absolutely forbidden that any information given
to the judge by the parties or the advocates, or by any other persons,
be excluded from the acts of the case.
§2 If the pleadings in the case are made in writing, the judge may,
in order to clarify any outstanding issues, order that a moderate oral
discussion be held before the tribunal in session.
Can. 1605 The notary is to be present at the oral discussion
mentioned in canon. 1602 §1 and 1604 §2, so that, if the judge so
orders, or the parties so request and the judge consents, the notary can
immediately make a written report of what has been discussed and
concluded.
Can. 1606 If the parties neglect to prepare their pleadings within
the time allotted to them, or if they entrust themselves to the
knowledge and conscience of the judge, and if at the same time the judge
perceives the matter quite clearly from the acts and the proofs, he can
pronounce judgment at once. He must, however, seek the observations of
the promoter of justice and the defender of the bond if they were
engaged in the trial.
TITLE VII : THE PRONOUNCEMENTS OF THE
JUDGE
Can. 1607 A principal case which has been dealt with in judicial
fashion is decided by the judge by a definitive judgment. An incidental
matter is decided by an interlocutory judgment, without prejudice to
can. 1589
Can. 1608 §1 To give any judgment, the judge must have in his mind
moral certainty about the matter to be decided in the judgment.
§2 The judge must derive this certainty from the acts of the case
and from the proofs.
§3 The judge must conscientiously weigh the evidence, with due
regard for the provisions of law about the efficacy of certain evidence.
§4 A judge who cannot arrive at such certainty is to pronounce that
the right of the plaintiff is not established and is to find for the
respondent except in a case which enjoys the favor of law, when he is to
pronounce in its favor.
Can. 1609 §1 The presiding judge of a collegiate tribunal decides
the day and time when it is to meet for discussion. Unless a special
reason requires otherwise, the meeting is to be at the tribunal office.
§2 On the day appointed for the meeting, the individual judges are
to bring their written conclusions on the merits of the case, with the
reasons in law and in fact for reaching their conclusions. These
conclusions are to be added to the acts of the case and to be kept in
secrecy.
§3 Having invoked the divine Name, they are to offer their
conclusions in order, beginning always with the 'ponens' or 'relator' in
the case, and then in order of precedence. Under the chairmanship of the
presiding judge, they are to hold their discussion principally with a
view to establishing what is to be stated in the dispositive part of the
judgment.
§4 In the discussion, each one is permitted to depart from an
original conclusion. A judge who does not wish to accede to the decision
of the others can demand that, if there is an appeal, his or her
conclusions be forwarded to the higher tribunal.
§5 If the judges do not wish, or are unable, to reach a decision in
the first discussion, they can defer their decision to another meeting,
but not beyond one week, unless the instruction of the case has to be
completed in accordance with can. 1600.
Can. 1610 §1 If there is a sole judge, he will draw up the judgment.
§2 In a collegiate tribunal, the 'ponens' or 'relator' is to draw up
the judgment, using as reasons those tendered by the individual judges
in their discussion, unless the reasons to be preferred have been
defined by a majority of the judges. The judgment must then be submitted
to the individual judges for their approval.
§3 The judgment is to be issued not later than one month from the
day on which the case was decided, unless in a collegiate tribunal the
judges have for grave reasons stipulated a longer time.
Can. 1611 The judgment must:
1° define the controversy raised before the tribunal, giving
appropriate answers to the individual questions;
2° determine the obligations of the parties arising from the trial
and the manner in which these are to be fulfilled
3° set out the reasons or motives, both in law and in fact, upon
which the dispositive part of the judgment is based;
4° apportion the expenses of the suit.
Can. 1612 §1 The judgment, after the invocation of the divine Name
must state in order the judge or tribunal, and the plaintiff, respondent
and procurator, with names and domiciles duly indicated. It is also to
name the promoter of justice and the defender of the bond if they were
engaged in the trial.
§2 It must then briefly set out the alleged facts, with the
conclusions of the parties and the formulation of the doubt.
§3 Then follows the dispositive part of the judgment, prefaced by
the reasons which support it.
§4 It ends with the date and the place in which it was given, and
with the signature of the judge or, in the case of a collegiate
tribunal, of all the judges, and of the notary.
Can. 1613 The rules set out above for a definitive judgment are to be
adapted also to interlocutory judgments.
Can. 1614 A judgment is to be published as soon as possible, with an
indication of the ways in which it can be challenged. Before publication
it has no effect, even if the dispositive part may, with the permission
of the judge, have been notified to the parties.
Can. 1615 The publication or notification of the judgment can be
effected by giving a copy of the judgment to the parties or to their
procurators, or by sending them a copy of it in accordance with can.
1509.
Can. 1616 §1 A judgment must be corrected or completed by the
tribunal which gave it if, in the text of a judgment, there is an error
in calculations, or a material error in the transcription of either the
dispositive part or the presentation of the facts or the pleadings of
the parties, or if any of the items required by can. 1612, §4 are
omitted. This is to be done either at the request of the parties or ex
officio, but always after having consulted the parties and by a decree
appended to the foot of the judgment.
§2 If one party is opposed, an incidental question is to be decided
by a decree.
Can. 1617 Other pronouncements of a judge apart from the judgment,
are decrees. If they are more than mere directions about procedure, they
have no effect unless they give at least a summary of their reasons or
refer to motives expressed in another act.
Can. 1618 An interlocutory judgment or a decree has the force of a
definitive judgment if, in respect of at least one of the parties, it
prevents the trial, or brings to an end the trial itself or any instance
of it.
TITLE VIII: CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT
CHAPTER I : THE PLAINT OF NULLITY OF THE JUDGMENT
Can. 1619 Without prejudice to canon. 1622 and 1623, whenever a case
concerns the good of private individuals, acts which are null with a
nullity established by positive law are validated by the judgment
itself, if the nullity was known to the party making the plaint and was
not raised with the judge before the judgment.
Can. 1620 A judgment is null with a nullity which cannot be remedied,
1° it was given by a judge who was absolutely noncompetent;
2° it was given by a person who has no power to judge in the
tribunal in which the case was decided;
3° the judge was compelled by force or grave fear to deliver
judgment;
4° the trial took place without the judicial plea mentioned in can.
1501, or was not brought against some party as respondent;
5° it was given between parties of whom at least one has no right to
stand before the court;
6° someone acted in another's name without a lawful mandate;
7° the right of defense was denied to one or other party;
8° the controversy has not been even partially decided.
Can. 1621 In respect of the nullity mentioned in can. 1620, a plaint
of nullity can be made in perpetuity by means of an exception, or within
ten years of the date of publication of the judgment by means of an
action before the judge who delivered the judgment.
Can. 1622 A judgment is null with a nullity which is simply
remediable, if:
1° contrary to the requirements of can. 1425, §1, it was not given
by the lawful number of judges;
2° it does not contain the motives or reasons for the decision;
3° it lacks the signatures prescribed by the law;
4° it does not contain an indication of the year, month, day and
place it was given;
5° it is founded on a judicial act which is null and whose nullity
has not been remedied in accordance with can. 1619;
6° it was given against a party who, in accordance with can. 1593,
§2, was lawfully absent.
Can. 1623 In the cases mentioned in can. 1622, a plaint of nullity
can be proposed within three months of notification of the publication
of the judgment.
Can. 1624 The judge who gave the judgment is to consider the plaint
of its nullity. If the party fears that the judge who gave the judgment
is biased, and consequently considers him suspect, he or she can demand
that another judge take his place in accordance with can. 1450.
Can. 1625 Within the time limit established for appeal, a plaint of
nullity can be proposed together with the appeal.
Can. 1626 §1 A plaint of nullity can be made not only by parties who
regard themselves as injured, but also by the promoter of justice and
the defender of the bond, whenever they have a right to intervene.
§2 Within the time limit established in can. 1623, the judge himself
can retract or correct an invalid judgment he has given, unless in the
meantime an appeal joined to a plaint of nullity has been lodged, or the
nullity has been remedied by the expiry of the time limit mentioned in
can. 1623.
Can. 1627 Cases concerning a plaint of nullity can be dealt with in
accordance with the norms for an oral contentious process.
CHAPTER II : THE APPEAL
Can. 1628 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1629, a party
who considers him or herself to be injured by a judgment has a right to
appeal from the judgment to a higher judge; in cases in which their
presence is required, the promoter of justice and the defender of the
bond have likewise the right to appeal.
Can. 1629 No appeal is possible against:
1° a judgment of the Supreme Pontiff himself, or a judgment of the
Apostolic Signatura;
2° a judgment which is null, unless the appeal is lodged together
with a plaint of nullity, in accordance with can. 1625;
3° a judgment which has become an adjudged matter
4° a decree of the judge or an interlocutory judgment, which does
not have the force of a definitive judgment, unless the appeal is lodged
together with an appeal against the definitive judgment;
5° a judgment or a decree in a case in which the law requires that
the matter be settled with maximum expedition.
Can. 1630 §1 The appeal must be lodged with the judge who delivered
the judgment, within a peremptory time limit of fifteen canonical days
from notification of the publication of the judgment.
§2 If it is made orally, the notary is to draw up the appeal in
writing in the presence of the appellant.
Can. 1631 If a question arises about the right of appeal, the appeal
tribunal is to determine it with maximum expedition, in accordance with
the norms for an oral contentious process.
Can. 1632 §1 If there is no indication of the tribunal to which the
appeal is directed, it is presumed to be made of the tribunal mentioned
in canon. 1438 and 1439.
§2 If the other party has resorted to some other appeal tribunal,
the tribunal which is of the higher grade is to determine the case,
without prejudice to can. 1415.
Can. 1633 The appeal is to be pursued before the appeal judge within
one month of its being forwarded, unless the originating judge allows
the party a longer time to pursue it.
Can. 1634 §1 To pursue the appeal, it is required and is sufficient
that the party request the assistance of the higher judge to amend the
judgment which is challenged, enclosing a copy of the judgment and
indicating the reasons for the appeal.
§2 If the party is unable to obtain a copy of the appealed judgment
from the originating tribunal within the canonical time limit, this time
limit is in the meantime suspended. The problem is to be made known to
the appeal judge, who is to oblige the originating judge by precept to
fulfill his duty as soon as possible.
§3 In the meantime, the originating judge must forward the acts to
the appeal court in accordance with can. 1474.
Can. 1635 The appeal is considered to be abandoned if the time limits
for an appeal before either the originating judge or the appeal judge
have expired without action being taken.
Can. 1636 §1 The appellant can renounce the appeal, with the effects
mentioned in can. 1525.
§2 Unless the law provides otherwise, an appeal made by the defender
of the bond or the promoter of justice, can be renounced by the defender
of the bond or the promoter of justice of the appeal tribunal.
Can. 1637 §1 An appeal made by the plaintiff benefits the
respondent, and vice versa.
§2 If there are several respondents or plaintiffs, and the judgment
is challenged by only one of them, or is made against only one of them,
the challenge is considered to be made by all and against all whenever
the thing requested is an individual one or the obligation is a joint
one.
§3 If one party challenges a judgment in regard to one ground, the
other party can appeal incidentally on the other grounds, even if the
canonical time limit for the appeal has expired. This incidental case is
to be appealed within a peremptory time limit of fifteen days from the
day of notification of the principal appeal.
§4 Unless the contrary is clear, an appeal is presumed to be against
all the grounds of the judgment.
Can. 1638 An appeal suspends the execution of the judgment.
Can. 1639 §1 Without prejudice to the provision of can. 1683, a new
ground cannot be introduced at the appeal grade, not even by way of the
useful accumulation of grounds. So the joinder of the issue can concern
itself only with the confirmation or the reform of the first judgment,
either in part or in whole.
§2 New evidence is admitted only in accordance with can. 1600.
Can. 1640 With the appropriate adjustments, the procedure at the
appeal grade is to be the same as in first instance. Unless the evidence
is to be supplemented, however, once the issue has been joined in
accordance with can. 1513 §1 and can. 1639 §1, the judges are to
proceed immediately to the discussion of the case and the judgment.
TITLE IX: ADJUDGED MATTER AND TOTAL
REINSTATEMENT
CHAPTER I : ADJUDGED MATTER
Can. 1641 Without prejudice to can. 1643, an adjudged matter occurs
when:
1° there are two conforming judgments between the same parties about
the same matter and on the same grounds;
2° no appeal was made against the judgment within the canonical time
limit;
3° the trial has been abated or renounced in the appeal grade;
4° a definitive judgment has been given from which, in accordance
with can. 1629, there is no appeal.
Can. 1642 §1 An adjudged matter has the force of law and cannot be
challenged directly, except in accordance with can. 1645 §1.
§2 It has the effect of law between the parties; it gives the right
to an action arising from the judgment and to an exception of an
adjudged matter; to prevent a new introduction of the same case, the
judge can even declare such an exception ex officio.
Can. 1643 Cases concerning the status of persons never become an
adjudged matter, not excepting cases which concern the separation of
spouses.
Can. 1644 §1 If two conforming sentences have been given in cases
concerning the status of persons, recourse to a tribunal of appeal can
be made at any time, to be supported by new and serious evidence or
arguments which are to be submitted within a peremptory time limit of
thirty days from the time the challenge was made. Within one month of
receiving the new evidence and arguments, the appeal tribunal must
declare by a decree whether or not a new presentation of the case is to
be admitted.
§2 Recourse to a higher tribunal to obtain a new presentation of the
case does not suspend the execution of the judgment, unless the law
provides otherwise or the appeal tribunal orders a suspension in
accordance with can. 1650 §3.
CHAPTER II : TOTAL REINSTATEMENT
Can. 1645 §1 Against a judgment which has become an adjudged matter
there can be a total reinstatement, provided it is clearly established
that the judgment was unjust.
§2 Injustice is not, however, considered clearly established unless:
1° the judgment is so based on evidence which is subsequently shown
to be false, that without this evidence the dispositive part of the
judgment could not be sustained;
2° documents are subsequently discovered by which new facts
demanding a contrary decision are undoubtedly proven;
3° the judgment was given through the deceit of one party to the
harm of the other;
4° a provision of a law which was not merely procedural was
evidently neglected;
5° the judgment runs counter to a preceding decision which has
become an adjudged matter.
Can. 1646 §1 Total reinstatement based on the reasons mentioned in
can. 1645 §2, nn. 13, is to be requested from the judge who delivered
the judgment within three months from the day on which these reasons
became known.
§2 Total reinstatement based on the reasons mentioned in can. 1645
§2, nn. 4 and 5, is to be requested from the appeal tribunal within
three months of notification of the publication of the judgment. In the
case mentioned in can. 1645 §2, n. 5, if the preceding decision is not
known until later, the time limit begins at the time the knowledge was
obtained.
§3 The time limits mentioned above do not apply for as long as the
aggrieved party is a minor.
Can. 1647 §1 A plea for total reinstatement suspends the execution
of a judgments which has not yet begun.
§2 If there are probable indications leading the judge to suspect
that the plea was made to cause delays in execution, he may decide that
the judgment be executed. The person seeking total reinstatement is,
however, to be given suitable guarantees that, if it is granted, he or
she will be indemnified.
Can. 1648 Where total reinstatement is granted, the judge must
pronounce judgment of the merits of the case.
TITLE X : JUDICIAL EXPENSES AND FREE
LEGAL AID
Can. 1649 §1 The Bishop who is responsible for governing the
tribunal is to establish norms concerning:
1° declarations that parties are liable for the payment or
reimbursement of judicial expenses;
2° the honorariums for advocates, experts and interpreters, and the
expenses of witnesses;
3° the granting of free legal aid and the reduction of expenses;
4° the payment of damages owed by a person who not merely lost the
case, but was rash in having recourse to litigation;
5° the money to be deposited, or the guarantee to be given, for the
payment of expenses and the compensation of damages.
§2 No distinct appeal exists from a pronouncement concerning
expenses, honorariums and damages. The parties can, however, have
recourse within ten days to the same judge, who can change the sum
involved.
TITLE XI: THE EXECUTION OF THE
JUDGMENT
Can. 1650 §1 A judgment which becomes adjudged matter can be
executed, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1647.
§2 The judge who delivered the judgment and, if there has been an
appeal, the appeal judge, can either ex officio or at the request of a
party order the provisional execution of a judgment which has not yet
become an adjudged matter, adding if need be appropriate guarantees when
it is a matter of provisions or payments concerning necessary support.
They can also do so for some other just and urgent reason.
§3 If the judgment mentioned in §2 is challenged, the judge who
must deal with the challenge can suspend the execution or subject it to
a guarantee, if he sees that the challenge is probably well founded and
that irreparable harm could result from execution.
Can. 1651 Execution cannot take place before there is issued the
judge's executing decree directing that the judgment be executed.
Depending on the nature of the case, this decree is to be either
included in the judgment itself or issued separately.
Can. 1652 If the execution of the judgment requires a prior statement
of reasons, this is to be treated as an incidental question, to be
decided by the judge who gave the judgment which is to be executed.
Can. 1653 §1 Unless particular law provides otherwise, the Bishop of
the diocese in which the first instance judgment was given must, either
personally or through another, execute the judgment.
§2 If he refuses or neglects to do so, the execution of the
judgment, at the request of an interested party or ex officio, belongs
to the authority to which the appeal tribunal is subject in accordance
with can. 1439 §3.
§3 Between religious, the execution of the judgment is the
responsibility of the Superior who gave the judgment which is to be
executed, or who delegated the judge.
Can. 1654 §1 The executor must execute the judgment according to the
obvious sense of the words, unless in the judgment itself something is
left to his discretion.
§2 He can deal with exceptions concerning the manner and the force
of the execution, but not with the merits of the case. If he has
ascertained from some other source that the judgment is null or
manifestly unjust according to canon. 1620, 1622 and 1645, he is to
refrain from executing the judgment, and is instead to refer the matter
to the tribunal which delivered the judgment and to notify the parties.
Can. 1655 §1 In real actions, whenever it is decided that a thing
belongs to the plaintiff, it is to be handed over to the plaintiff as
soon as the matter has become an adjudged matter.
§2 In personal actions, when a guilty person is condemned to hand
over a movable possession or to pay money, or to give or do something,
the judge in the judgment itself, or the executor according to his
discretion and prudence, is to assign a time limit for the fulfillment
of the obligation. This time limit is to be not less than fifteen days
nor more than six months.
SECTION II: THE ORAL CONTENTIOUS
PROCESS
Can. 1656 §1 The oral contentious process dealt with in this section
can be used in all cases which are not excluded by law, unless a party
requests an ordinary contentious process.
§2 If the oral process is used in cases other than those permitted
by the law, the judicial acts are null.
Can. 1657 An oral contentious process in first instance is made
before a sole judge, in accordance with can. 1424.
Can. 1658 §1 In addition to the matters enumerated in can. 1504, the
petition which introduces the suit must:
1° set forth briefly, fully and clearly the facts on which the
plaintiff's pleas are based;
2° indicate the evidence by which the plaintiff intends to
demonstrate the facts and which cannot be brought forward with the
petition; this is to be done in such a way that the evidence can
immediately be gathered by the judge.
§2 Documents which support the plea must be added to the petition,
at least in authentic copy.
Can. 1659 §1 If an attempt at mediation in accordance with can. 1446
§2 has proven fruitless, the judge, if he deems that the petition has
some foundation, is within three days to add a decree at the foot of the
petition. In this decree he is to order that a copy of the plea be
notified to the respondent, with the right to send a written reply to
the tribunal office within fifteen days.
§2 This notification has the effects of a judicial summons that are
as mentioned in can. 1512.
Can. 1660 If the exceptions raised by the respondent so require, the
judge is to assign the plaintiff a time limit for a reply, so that from
the material advanced by each he can clearly discern the object of the
controversy.
Can. 1661 §1 When the time limits mentioned in canon. 1659 and 1660
have expired, the judge, after examining the acts, is to determine the
point at issue. He is then to summon all who must be present to a
hearing, which is to be held within thirty days; for the parties, he is
to add the formulation of the point at issue.
§2 In the summons the parties are to be informed that, to support
their assertions, they can submit a short written statement to the
tribunal at least three days before the hearing.
Can. 1662 In the hearing, the questions mentioned in canon. 14591464
are considered first.
Can. 1663 §1 The evidence is assembled during the hearing, without
prejudice to the provision of can. 1418.
§2 A party and his or her advocate can assist at the examination of
the other parties, of the witnesses and of the experts.
Can. 1664 The replies of the parties, witnesses and experts, and the
pleas and exceptions of the advocates, are to be written down by the
notary in summary fashion, restricting the record to those things which
bear on the substance of the controversy. This record is to be signed by
the persons testifying.
Can. 1665 The judge can admit evidence which is not alleged or sought
in the plea or the reply, but only in accordance with can. 1452. After
the hearing of even one witness, however, the judge can admit new
evidence only in accordance with can. 1600.
Can. 1666 If all the evidence cannot be collected during the hearing,
a further hearing is to be set.
Can. 1667 When the evidence has been collected, an oral discussion is
to take place at the same hearing.
Can. 1668 §1 At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge can decide
the case forthwith, unless it emerges from the discussion that something
needs to be added to the instruction of the case, or that there is
something which prevents a judgment being correctly delivered. The
dispositive part of the judgment is to be read immediately in the
presence of the parties.
§2 Because of the difficulty of the matter, or for some other just
reason the decision of the tribunal can be deferred for up to five
canonical days.
§3 The full text of the judgment, including the reasons for it, is
to be notified to the parties as soon as possible, normally within
fifteen days.
Can. 1669 If the appeal tribunal discerns that a lower tribunal has
used the oral contentious procedure in cases which are excluded by law,
it is to declare the judgment invalid and refer the case back to the
tribunal which delivered the judgment.
Can. 1670 In all other matters concerning procedure, the provisions
of the canons on ordinary contentious trials are to be followed. In
order to expedite matters, however, while safeguarding justice, the
tribunal can, by a decree and for stated reasons, derogate from
procedural norms which are not prescribed for validity. |